[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gc.m4 and hard failure
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: gc.m4 and hard failure |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:11:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:41:29PM CET:
>>
>> Seems good. I installed this. Review appreciated (untested).
>
> All good except for:
>
>> + if test "$NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE" != "no"; then
>> + AC_CHECK_FILE($NAME_OF_NONCE_DEVICE,,
>> + AC_MSG_WARN([[Device `$NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE' does not exist,
>> consider to use --enable-nonce-device]]))
>> + fi
>
> NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE and NAME_OF_NONCE_DEVICE are not the same
> variables (two instances).
Fixed, thanks.
Now that this is settled, I'm beginning to think that the random
functions should be decoupled from GC fully. I.e., there should be a
standalone module 'random', and then gc-random could use it. This is
more similar to other gc modules. IIRC, CoreUtils random-sort might
be one user of this 'random' module.
- gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/03
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/04
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/07
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/07
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Paul Eggert, 2006/03/10