[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gc.m4 and hard failure
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: gc.m4 and hard failure |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:40:50 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> Now that this is settled, I'm beginning to think that the random
> functions should be decoupled from GC fully. I.e., there should be a
> standalone module 'random', and then gc-random could use it. This is
> more similar to other gc modules. IIRC, CoreUtils random-sort might
> be one user of this 'random' module.
Something like that sounds reasonable. I have some random code
already drafted for coreutils, designed to be used for both 'sort' and
for a new 'shuf' program. I'll take a look at gc* and see how well
the two modules compare.
- gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/03
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/04
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/07
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/07
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure, Simon Josefsson, 2006/03/08
- Re: gc.m4 and hard failure,
Paul Eggert <=