[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?
From: |
Narcis Garcia |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2013 19:14:05 +0200 |
I suppose that GnuZilla is licensed with the same license as Mozilla
(MPL); am I right?
Al 13/05/13 18:38, En/na Jason Self ha escrit:
> Sure - if you want to come up with your own definition of free
> software it can be whatever you want. People have come up with their
> own definitions before: There's "Debian free" and "Fedora free", for
> example, so that would be nothing new. However, a program with a
> requirement of being distributed non-commercially wouldn't be "FSF
> free" which is the point I was trying to make when the original
> recommendation was made that people on Windows simply download & use
> Firefox instead. Recommending that they use a program that isn't "FSF
> free" is probably not a good idea.
>
>
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, al3xu5 / dotcommon, 2013/05/11
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, Jason Self, 2013/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, Narcis Garcia, 2013/05/12
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, al3xu5 / dotcommon, 2013/05/12
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, Julian, 2013/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, Narcis Garcia, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?, Loic J. Duros, 2013/05/10
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [gnu.org #829168] GNUzilla and IceCat for Windows?,
Narcis Garcia <=