[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation warning
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: compilation warning |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:24:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
According to Jim Meyering on 2/6/2010 2:20 PM:
>> Rather than declaring to always fail and Pexecute to just abort(), maybe
>> it would make more sense to omit their declarations altogether in that
>> instance, and not even expose the command line option? Or is that too
>> drastic, and we should come up with some other alternative?
>
> Taking a non-invasive approach, so far I've always solved this
> by installing the required package.
Yes, and that's how I got past the error. But either we should document
pcre-devel as a dependency in HACKING, or we should still consider that
not everyone necessarily wants pcre-enabled grep.
--
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature