[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation warning
From: |
Tony Abou-Assaleh |
Subject: |
Re: compilation warning |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:53:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) |
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 2/6/2010 2:20 PM:
>>> Rather than declaring to always fail and Pexecute to just abort(), maybe
>>> it would make more sense to omit their declarations altogether in that
>>> instance, and not even expose the command line option? Or is that too
>>> drastic, and we should come up with some other alternative?
>> Taking a non-invasive approach, so far I've always solved this
>> by installing the required package.
>
> Yes, and that's how I got past the error. But either we should document
> pcre-devel as a dependency in HACKING, or we should still consider that
> not everyone necessarily wants pcre-enabled grep.
Or both? That is, all dependencies should be documented, including the
optional ones, and not all dependencies (such as PCRE support) should be
required.
Cheers,
TAA
--
Tony Abou-Assaleh, PhD
Email: address@hidden
Web site: http://tony.abou-assaleh.net
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tabouasssaleh
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tony_aa