[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: URW font download link not valid
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: URW font download link not valid |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:57:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
* Dale Snell <address@hidden> [2019-08-10 04:28]:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:41 PM Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:
> >
> > configure:
> > No URW fonts in .pfb format were found on your system, URW fonts
> > generation for 'devpdf' will not work properly. These fonts can be
> > downloaded here:
> >
> > http://downloads.ghostscript.com/public/fonts/urw-base35-v1.10.zip
> >
> > Configure is complaining. But urw fonts are not at that link.
> >
> > I am using git groff latest. Maybe it has to be updated to proper link.
>
> The base-35 fonts are no longer maintained on the Artifex Software /
> Ghostscript web site. Nor are they on the URW++ web site. Rather,
> they are on Github. There are two web pages:
>
> https://github.com/URWTypeFoundry/Core_35
>
> and
>
> https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts
>
> The URW++ page has version 2.00 of the base-35 fonts, dated 2016. The
> Artifex page has the same fonts, but with some bug fixes, and is dated
> 2017. It also has the current fontconfig configuration files, so
> that's probably what I'd download.
>
> That said, the error you're getting from configure almost certainly
> has a different source. The files are very likely on your system
> already, but the names have been changed. The original, very cryptic
> file names have been changed to more readable names. (Well, mostly.)
> Alas, configure is still looking for the original filenames.
> Actually, it's only looking for one file; one of the Gothic fonts, if
> I recall correctly. The URW base-35 fonts should be in your system
> fonts directory. Something like
>
> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
>
> (which is where it is on my Fedora 29 system). In that directory, make
> a symbolic link from URWGothic-Book.t1 to a010013l.pfb. Configure
> should be able to find the URW fonts that way.
>
> I went through much the same thing some months back, and I'm writing
> this from my admittedly imperfect memory. I'd suggest checking the
> Groff mailing list archives for the emails about the problems I had.
> Scrolling back through my Gmail list, I see that it was in March of
> this year. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to post
> them.
>
> I hope this helps.
I found that I have package `gsfonts' and that fonts are liste as
following below, please confirm if these fonts are those we are
speaking about?
I will try now using following configure:
./configure --prefix /package/text/groff
--with-urw-fonts-dir=/usr/share/fonts/OTF/
And will file a bug for my GNU/Linux distribution
https://www.hyperbola.info on missing fonts
gsfonts /usr/
gsfonts /usr/share/
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/C059-BdIta.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/C059-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/C059-Italic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/C059-Roman.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/D050000L.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusMonoPS-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusMonoPS-Italic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusMonoPS-Regular.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusRoman-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusRoman-Italic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusRoman-Regular.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSans-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSans-BoldOblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSans-Oblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSans-Regular.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/P052-Bold.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/P052-BoldItalic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/P052-Italic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/P052-Roman.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/StandardSymbolsPS.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWBookman-Demi.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWBookman-DemiItalic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWBookman-Light.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWBookman-LightItalic.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWGothic-Book.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWGothic-BookOblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWGothic-Demi.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/URWGothic-DemiOblique.otf
gsfonts /usr/share/fonts/OTF/Z003-MediumItalic.otf
- URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/09
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Dale Snell, 2019/08/09
- Re: URW font download link not valid,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/10
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Dale Snell, 2019/08/11
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/13
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Dale Snell, 2019/08/14
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/16
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Dale Snell, 2019/08/16
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/16
- Re: URW font download link not valid, Jean Louis, 2019/08/16
Re: URW font download link not valid, Bjarni Ingi Gislason, 2019/08/09