[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installation on RAID-only system
From: |
Molle Bestefich |
Subject: |
Re: Installation on RAID-only system |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:21:23 -0800 |
> Perhaps it's time to try GRUB again. [...]
> Why hasn't it been done yet? [...]
Well, seems that GRUB has a nice workaround.
It allows you to choose which BIOS drive maps to which Linux drive - neat!
Still doesn't work though. I'm getting errors :-/:
# Tell GRUB not to f... up, I hope.
$ sbin/grub --device-map=/dev/null
# Tell GRUB what BIOS 0x80 is.
grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf
# Tell GRUB on which partition (1st logical) to find it's files
grub> root (hd0,5)/boot
Attempt to open drive 0x80 (/dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf)
Error 18: Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported by BIOS.
# OK, that didn't work. Try pointing GRUB to the partition itself.
grub> device (hd0,5) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf6
# Once again tell GRUB to find it's files under /boot on the reiser3.6
filesystem on that partition...
grub> root (hd0,5)/boot
Attempt to open drive 0x80 (/dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf6)
Error 5: Partition table invalid or corrupt
grub>
I can use "rootnoverify", but that just postpones the (same) error
messages to when the setup command is run.
What am I doing wrong?
I'm puzzled that GRUB looks for a partition table inside a logical
partition (notice the ".../hpt37x_ehgjaggaf_6_ part)?
Also puzzled by the cylinder message. What is that supposed to mean?
The linux partition resides from 20-40 GB on the RAID array, that
can't be too far off when using LBA?
For the record, neither parted nor fdisk can see anything wrong with
the partitioning on the "disk"..
- Re: Installation on RAID-only system,
Molle Bestefich <=
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/21
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Molle Bestefich, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Molle Bestefich, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/22