[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grub 0.96 bug
From: |
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger |
Subject: |
Re: grub 0.96 bug |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:35:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040906 |
Molle Bestefich schrieb:
> Chris Nicola wrote:
>
>>Yes I am having the exact same problem. I am actually just going to try
>>and lower version of grub for now but I will try this patch if that
>>still happens.
>
>
> Just did this:
> ==========
> grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf
> grub> root (hd0,5)/boot
> Filesystem type is reiserfs, partition type 0x83
> grub> setup (hd0)
> ==========
>
> and it destroyed my RAID0.
> GRUB is such a piece of crap :-).
Um, GRUB works fine for me, even on totally crazy RAID systems not yet
supported by dmraid. There is a well-kept secret you need to know:
You can install GRUB just fine IFF you boot from a GRUB boot floppy.
NEVER (except for trivial configurations) use the GRUB shell running
under any operating system.
> It must be severely broken; since if it just sticked to writing to the
> device I pointed it at (hpt37x_ehgjaggaf) which is a RAID0 "virtual
> disk" / whatever, it should never be able to overwrite metadata out on
> the physical disk.
>
> Anyway, just wanted to tell you to beware.
> Gerte has a GRUB example on his page where he does setup (hd0,5)
> instead of setup (hd0), perhaps that's how it's meant to work.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
- Re: Installation on RAID-only system, Molle Bestefich, 2005/03/21
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/21
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Molle Bestefich, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Molle Bestefich, 2005/03/22
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug, Wilfried Weissmann, 2005/03/22
Re: Installation on RAID-only system, Jonathan Goldblatt, 2005/03/21