[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Dec 2002 21:33:39 +0100 |
I agree that 2^64 bits is amazingly huge. But doesn't this sort of
assumption tend to lead to problems later on down the road?
If I have 99 years of 1024x1024@24 50frames/sec movies, and 32061
terabytes of mail, music and other crap, than I have other problems to
think about.
2^64 is so absurdly large that it is not worth even thinking about
what one will do later right now. It is not like a silly string
limit that one can hit at any time.
And can we go back to the discussion about what apparoch should be
taken to fix the file-system limit? Earth calling Roland and Thomas
please respond.
- 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/05
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., M. Gerards, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Joshua Judson Rosen, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Roland McGrath, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Niels Möller, 2002/12/09
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/09
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06