[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
From: |
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver |
Subject: |
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion. |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Dec 2002 03:28:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> 64-bit systems do not necessarily give you 64-bits of virtual address
> space (even discounting the kernel's area). Alpha, for instance, only
> gives you 43 bits. There are real practical reasons for doing this:
> the page tables become far too deep and costly for no benefit (8k
> pages => 13 bits + 10k entries per page table * 3 levels of page
> tables).
If you use 8Kbyte pages. 64Kbyte pages gives you already 55 bits of virtual
address space.
:)
Cheers,
p2.
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., (continued)
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., M. Gerards, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Tom Hart, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.,
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <=
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Joshua Judson Rosen, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Roland McGrath, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Niels Möller, 2002/12/09
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/09
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Nicola Girardi, 2002/12/06