[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?
From: |
Stephan Trebels |
Subject: |
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple? |
Date: |
04 Apr 2003 16:38:19 +0200 |
Forgive me my ignorance, but wasn't the kernel the Hurd, while gnumach,
oskit-mach, L4 are just microkernels underneath? I'd have expected
i386-pc-hurd-gnu with no place currently to put the l4/gnumach variant
of the Hurd.
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 13:43, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> So where is *-gnu-gnu used?
>
> Nowhere, *-gnu-gnu has never been used. The correct format of the
> tuple has always been CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-KERNEL-OPERATING_SYSTEM
> (or the shorter form CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM). So a
> tuple for say GNU Mach might be: i386-pc-gnumach-gnu and for L4
> i386-pc-l4-gnu (with the shorter form being i386-pc-gnu in both cases)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-hurd mailing list
> Bug-hurd@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
--
Stephan Trebels <stephan@ncube.de> Consultant
company: nCUBE Deutschland GmbH, Hanauer Str. 56, 80992 Munich, Germany
phone: cell:+49 172 8433111 office:+49 89 1498930 fax:+49 89 14989350
- Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/03
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/04/04
- Binutils patches, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Binutils patches, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04