[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:56:48 +0200 (MEST) |
> Well, I have been working on Hurd, porting the hurd subsystem to
> the gcc under linux so that you can compile it. That will allow
> us to use the introspector on it.
Why not just port the introspector to GNU/Hurd, and run it in
GNU/Hurd? You don't need to do ugly things (and useles) like getting
things compiling in GNU/Linux. Or you could just use a cross-compiler
which are simple to make if you have /lib and /include.
> Mach has a very interesting and clean api,
No it doesn't.
> but hurd is difficult to compile.
No it isn't.
Cheers.
- Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/16
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, PUYDT Julien, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Michael Banck, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marco Gerards, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/18