[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:52:14 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:03:58AM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > > No it doesn't.
> > > No it isn't.
> >
> > Looks like you have been watching too much Monty Python :
> [...]
> > It is too boring to argue with you.
>
> Do you know AMS well enough or are you just thin-skinned? ;)
I know him from #hurd, and he is very smart, and very aggressive with
his denyals.
>
> I was a bit surprised at your assertions about Mach and Hurd, too.
I think that mach has a very interesting and clean api for IPC. The
usage of ports everywhere makes it clean. Much more interesting than
the linux kernel.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
- Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/16
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, PUYDT Julien, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Michael Banck, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report,
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/10/17
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marco Gerards, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/10/18
- Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report, James Michael DuPont, 2003/10/18