[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal |
Date: |
17 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> writes:
> Eviction in itself does nothing except to raise the flag that page is
> evicted. When ext2fs searches for a page that can be remapped[1],
> only those that are marked as evicted _and_ with reference count of
> zero are considered for remapping. Locking and other stuff take care
> of the tricky remapping.
This is bad. When the kernel pages a page out, you must free the
memory. It is not ok to just set a flag and keep the page that the
kernel handed you. You must free it, or you are hosing the vm system.
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, (continued)
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/16
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/16
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17