|
From: | Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: | Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal |
Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:19:25 -0400 |
User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (UnebigoryĆmae) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At 17 Aug 2004 03:07:14 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> writes: > > > You are probably confused because "map" can have 2 meanings: > > > > 1. Mapping page of address space to page of pager. > > 2. Mapping page of pager to disk block. > > > > And the current ext2fs relies heavily on the ability to remap (2). > > Let's reserve "map" for the former, because that's the meaning it has > in Mach. I agree. Let's agree to call the later an association.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |