[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c |
Date: |
Tue, 12 May 2015 11:41:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Tue 12 May 2015 11:39:19 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 11:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 May 2015 10:00:26 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 09:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 12 May 2015 09:15:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > The idea is to limit the openmodes according to the values defined in
> > > > > struct netnode and to change the test for overlapping sets.
> > > >
> > > > In which case is this needed? What happens in that case and how the
> > > > patch fixes this?
> > >
> > > I already supplied a test case. What's up?
> >
> > Explain what happens.
> >
> > Only providing a testcase means the reviewer has to
>
> > For instance here, just inventing dumb things, it's just to give an
> > example of what I need to see explained to avoid having to spend a few
> > hours to understand what's happening: the testcase creates a socket,
>
> Sorry for the confusion: This patch is not about the socket creation
> case. It is about the build failure of gnat-4.9 with fakeroot-hurd. two
> different bugs!
Ok, this shows how explanation is more than welcome :)
Samuel
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/05/15