[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisited: Hurd on a cluster computer
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Revisited: Hurd on a cluster computer |
Date: |
Sun, 21 May 2017 15:42:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
Justus Winter, on dim. 21 mai 2017 15:39:07 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +0000, wrote:
> >> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
> >> microkernel in '386 protected mode that used segmentation heavily, am I
> >> correct in assuming that that sort of thing is completely deprecated in the
> >> interest of portability?
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> Though there was some work, a reimplementation if memory serves, of the
> netmsg servers. The archive should have some infos on that.
Well, that's unrelated to the question above, which was actually
unrelated to the original thread, which you are answering now :)
Samuel