[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisited: Hurd on a cluster computer
From: |
Justus Winter |
Subject: |
Re: Revisited: Hurd on a cluster computer |
Date: |
Sun, 21 May 2017 15:45:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.22+51~gcc1a6d2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> writes:
> Justus Winter, on dim. 21 mai 2017 15:39:07 +0200, wrote:
>> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Mark Morgan Lloyd, on sam. 20 mai 2017 12:18:01 +0000, wrote:
>> >> Finally, what is the Hurd portability situation? Way back I worked on a
>> >> microkernel in '386 protected mode that used segmentation heavily, am I
>> >> correct in assuming that that sort of thing is completely deprecated in
>> >> the
>> >> interest of portability?
>> >
>> > Indeed.
>>
>> Though there was some work, a reimplementation if memory serves, of the
>> netmsg servers. The archive should have some infos on that.
>
> Well, that's unrelated to the question above, which was actually
> unrelated to the original thread, which you are answering now :)
Ah, segmentation... Indeed, I wasn't reading that carefully, I thought
is was related to the in-kernel forwarding of Mach messages across
networks...
Justus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature