[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 01/23] hurd: Add some missing includes
From: |
Sergey Bugaev |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 01/23] hurd: Add some missing includes |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2024 00:24:30 +0300 |
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:08 AM Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is testing installed headers, isn't it? — then
> how come sysdeps/hurd/include/hurd.h is what gets found for <hurd.h>?
> I'm rather sure the installed <hurd.h> is a different file. So it
> would look like the test setup is broken, and this patch just exposes
> that.
Should the include <tls.h> be guarded by ifndef _ISOMAC perhaps? And
if we indeed move the inline functions to the internal hurd.h, they'd
also be guarded by ifndef _ISOMAC?
But really, why doesn't the test filter out the internal include directories?
Sergey
[PATCH 02/23] hurd: Declare _hurd_intr_rpc_msg* with protected visibility, Sergey Bugaev, 2024/01/03
[PATCH 04/23] mach: Drop some unnecessary vm_param.h includes, Sergey Bugaev, 2024/01/03
[RFC PATCH 03/23] Allow glibc to be compiled without EXEC_PAGESIZE, Sergey Bugaev, 2024/01/03
[RFC PATCH 08/23] hurd: Drop x86-specific assembly from init-first.c, Sergey Bugaev, 2024/01/03
[RFC PATCH 07/23] hurd: Pass the data pointer to _hurd_stack_setup explicitly, Sergey Bugaev, 2024/01/03