[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Dont use CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK() ear
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Dont use CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK() early |
|
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:26:14 +0100 |
Applied, thanks!
Damien Zammit via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le lun. 09 déc. 2024 12:17:30
+0000, a ecrit:
> Since we just set up the gs segment, we can use
> CPU_NUMBER instead of CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK.
> ---
> i386/i386/cpuboot.S | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/i386/i386/cpuboot.S b/i386/i386/cpuboot.S
> index 9ac86845..09855864 100644
> --- a/i386/i386/cpuboot.S
> +++ b/i386/i386/cpuboot.S
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ apboot_jmp_offset:
> wrmsr
>
> /* Load int_stack_top[cpu] -> esp */
> - CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK(%edx)
> + CPU_NUMBER(%edx)
> movl CX(EXT(int_stack_top), %edx), %esp
>
> /* Ensure stack alignment */
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
>
--
Samuel
> Voici mon problème, j'ai deux PCs relies par des cartes ethernet,
> configures avec le protocole PPP.
-+- Romain in Guide du linuxien pervers - "Ils sont fous ces romains !" -+-
- [PATCH 0/6 gnumach] Preparation for parallel SMP init, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- [PATCH 1/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Simplify for legibility, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- [PATCH 2/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Dont use CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK() early, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- Re: [PATCH 2/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Dont use CPU_NUMBER_NO_STACK() early,
Samuel Thibault <=
- [PATCH 3/6 gnumach] i386/cpuboot: Write gs selector correctly, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- [PATCH 4/6 gnumach] pmap: Separate temporary_mapping from set_page_dir, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- [PATCH 5/6 gnumach] smp: Use logical destination not physical apic id, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09
- [PATCH 6/6 gnumach] i386/apic: Fix condition on non-BSP, Damien Zammit, 2024/12/09