[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slur/downbow collision
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: slur/downbow collision |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:43:02 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> >> (assuming this is "wontfix" as in "delete the bug report and forget
> >> about
> >> the problem". If "wontfix" means "we'll have a look at it after the
> >> next stable
> >> release", then that's fine)
> >
> > I assume the wontfix means: dynamics are not like scripts, they need
> > more complex placement. Dynamics will get an overhaul, there won't be
> > a temporary slur collision hack.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear: I'm not talking about dynamics. I'm talking
> about a collision between an accent -> and slur, and between a
> \downbow and slur. script/slur, not dynamic/slur.
One of the problems I foresee is that we don't have the exact
dimensions of the scripts but only the bbox. This can make a big
difference. For example, Typically the + gets moved too far, while the
accent gets moved too little.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Erik Sandberg, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/09/28
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/28
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Erik Sandberg, 2004/09/28