[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slur/downbow collision
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: slur/downbow collision |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:47:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09.43, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > >> (assuming this is "wontfix" as in "delete the bug report and forget
> > >> about
> > >> the problem". If "wontfix" means "we'll have a look at it after the
> > >> next stable
> > >> release", then that's fine)
>
> One of the problems I foresee is that we don't have the exact
> dimensions of the scripts but only the bbox. This can make a big
> difference. For example, Typically the + gets moved too far, while the
> accent gets moved too little.
I do agree with Graham that it shouldn't be 'wontfix'; it should be something
like 'future'. With the rapid rate of development lily undergoes now, I
wouldn't be surprised if she would do things like calculating scripts' convex
hull before lilypond 5.0..
So I marked the bug as 'future' and will move it to the future branch.
Erik
- slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Erik Sandberg, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/27
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/09/28
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/09/28
- Re: slur/downbow collision, Graham Percival, 2004/09/28
- Re: slur/downbow collision,
Erik Sandberg <=