[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stemlength II
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: stemlength II |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:08:15 -0300 |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> could argue that lengthening a stem to avoid a collision that isn't a
>>> collision is a bug, but I wouldn't do so without Mike's input.
>>
>> Hm? A bug with an explanation and a workaround is still a bug as far as
>> I can see. Mike's input may be needed in order to decide whether to
> OK. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1613
I am testing a fix for this; it was an oversight of mine.
Graham,
this issue was exposed due to a (seemingly innocuous) one-line change
by Mike. Can I ask that you branch off the 2.14 branch so the release
candidate does not get disturbed by other one-liners with unintended
effects? If you don't branch off a stable branch, 2.14 will never get
finished.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- stemlength II, Friedrich Fischer, 2011/04/10
- Re: stemlength II, James Lowe, 2011/04/10
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- RE: stemlength II, James Lowe, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, David Kastrup, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: stemlength II, address@hidden, 2011/04/15
- Re: stemlength II, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/04/15
- Re: stemlength II, address@hidden, 2011/04/14