[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stemlength II
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: stemlength II |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:08:08 -0300 |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:30 AM, address@hidden
<address@hidden> wrote:
>>> OK. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1613
>>
>> I am testing a fix for this; it was an oversight of mine.
>>
>> Graham,
>>
>> this issue was exposed due to a (seemingly innocuous) one-line change
>> by Mike. Can I ask that you branch off the 2.14 branch so the release
>> candidate does not get disturbed by other one-liners with unintended
>> effects? If you don't branch off a stable branch, 2.14 will never get
>> finished.
>
> I agree - I think that if we branch off 2.14 after we fix the three
> remaining critical issues (all of which seem to have been recently
> introduced) and if everyone holds off on pushing new stuff for a bit (my
> MultiMeasureRest work, for example, won't make it into 2.14.0), we can still
> sit on it for a week or two before building it with GUB. During this
> incubation phase, we'd only apply patches that fix critical or high priority
> problems.
The beauty of branching off is that nobody needs to hold off anything.
You just continue to put stuff in master (2.15.0), and cherry-pick
whatever needs to go to 2.14.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- stemlength II, Friedrich Fischer, 2011/04/10
- Re: stemlength II, James Lowe, 2011/04/10
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- RE: stemlength II, James Lowe, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, David Kastrup, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, Phil Holmes, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/04/14
- Re: stemlength II, address@hidden, 2011/04/15
- Re: stemlength II,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: stemlength II, address@hidden, 2011/04/14