[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordG
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando] |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:43:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> I made several tries but none worked.
> This works:
>
> \octaveCheck c'
> \chordGlissando
> <bes cis fis>8 <b\3 d g>
>
>
> (full snippet attached)
>
> Maybe it could be added in the Documentation (NR 2.4.1, Default
> tablatures)?
I'd be happy to have that small example added. The "full snippet"
is too long for the docs unless you really need that extra
material.
> Also, I have a nitpick suggestion: is it possible to make the following
> sentence more "visible"? A warning/note maybe?
>
> "String numbers are necessary for TabStaff because automatic string
> calculations are different for chords and for single notes, and
> \chordGlissando draws lines between single notes."
That seems fine.
I see that you've done some Italian translations, so you clearly
know how to use git. Could you create a patch for these two
items, modifying the English documentation rather than the Italian
docs?
Cheers,
- Graham
- consecutive chordGlissando, Federico Bruni, 2011/04/20
- Re: consecutive chordGlissando, Carl Sorensen, 2011/04/21
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Federico Bruni, 2011/04/21
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Federico Bruni, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Carl Sorensen, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Colin Campbell, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], address@hidden, 2011/04/25