[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordG
From: |
Federico Bruni |
Subject: |
Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando] |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:31:02 +0200 |
Il giorno dom, 24/04/2011 alle 19.43 -0600, Carl Sorensen ha scritto:
> I find it simpler to just do
> \new TabStaff \relative c' {
> \chordGlissando
> <bes\3 cis\2 fis\1>8 <b\3 d\2 g\1>
> \chordGlissando
> <bes='\3 cis\2 fis\1>8 <b\3 d\2 g\1>
> }
>
> It still gets the warning, but I think it's easier than the
> \octaveCheck
> form.
>
I agree, but I thought it didn't work. It works indeed, if only = is
used (without '): <bes=\3
I'll use this snippet.
Thanks
- consecutive chordGlissando, Federico Bruni, 2011/04/20
- Re: consecutive chordGlissando, Carl Sorensen, 2011/04/21
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Federico Bruni, 2011/04/21
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Federico Bruni, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Carl Sorensen, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], Colin Campbell, 2011/04/25
- Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando], address@hidden, 2011/04/25