[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13 |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:41:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
> >> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
> >
> > Well, if
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
> > is the wrong url, then what's the right one?
>
> It is not that easy. You know that we do not write urls in web
> texinfo files. The resulting URL is a crazy combination of refs,
> macros, post processing and luck. In my offline copy, split link does
> work, bigpage link doesn't.
I know. I'm not asking for a fix. I'm asking what the online URL
is of the changes document in spanish.
> In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/web/changes.es.html ,
> links do work.
On that webpage, the html links go to English changes; only the
pdf link goes to Spanish. If you're happy with that, then I can
make the website do the same thing.
Cheers,
- Graham
- CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Xavier Scheuer, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Xavier Scheuer, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/09
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/09