[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13 |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:14:25 +0200 |
2011/6/7 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
>> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
>> >> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
>> >
>> > Well, if
>> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
>> > is the wrong url, then what's the right one?
>>
>> It is not that easy. You know that we do not write urls in web
>> texinfo files. The resulting URL is a crazy combination of refs,
>> macros, post processing and luck. In my offline copy, split link does
>> work, bigpage link doesn't.
>
> I know. I'm not asking for a fix. I'm asking what the online URL
> is of the changes document in spanish.
>
>> In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/web/changes.es.html ,
>> links do work.
>
> On that webpage, the html links go to English changes; only the
> pdf link goes to Spanish. If you're happy with that, then I can
> make the website do the same thing.
I think the Spanish page is not being generated, so yes, linking to
English as other languages do is the next bad thing. A Spanish PDF is
being generated and correctly linked; therefore, please, if any,
change only the two first link refs.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Xavier Scheuer, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Xavier Scheuer, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Francisco Vila, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/07
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/09
Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13, Graham Percival, 2011/06/09