[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?
|
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:54:29 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.3.170325 |
On 6/8/17 10:26 AM, "Federico Bruni" <address@hidden> wrote:
>http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-siz
>e.html
>
>"""
>Automatic font weight at different sizes
>
>The Emmentaler font provides the set of Feta musical glyphs in eight
>different sizes; each one tuned for a different staff size. The smaller
>the glyph size, the ³heavier² it becomes, so as to match the
>relatively thicker staff lines. Recommended glyphs sizes are listed in
>the following table:
>
>font name staff height (pt) staff height (mm) use
>feta11 11.22 3.9 pocket scores
>feta13 12.60 4.4
>[...]
>"""
>
>Should "font name" be replaced with "glyph name"?
Not in my opinion. The font is feta11 (the font family is feta). The
staff height is 11.22 pt. The staff height is 3.9 mm.
Thanks,
Carl