Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

[Federico Bruni]

Il giorno sab 10 giu 2017 alle 2:54, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> 
ha scritto:
> On 6/8/17 10:26 AM, "Federico Bruni" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/setting-the-staff-siz
> > e.html
> >
> > """
> > Automatic font weight at different sizes
> >
> > The Emmentaler font provides the set of Feta musical glyphs in eight
> > different sizes; each one tuned for a different staff size. The 
> > smaller
> > the glyph size, the ³heavier² it becomes, so as to match the
> > relatively thicker staff lines. Recommended glyphs sizes are listed 
> > in
> > the following table:
> >
> > font name       staff height (pt)       staff height (mm)       use
> > feta11  11.22   3.9     pocket scores
> > feta13  12.60   4.4
> > [...]
> > """
> >
> > Should "font name" be replaced with "glyph name"?
>
> Not in my opinion.  The font is feta11 (the font family is feta).  The
> staff height is 11.22 pt.  The staff height is 3.9 mm.

Hi Carl, are you sure?
The context of my report was:

commit 18d03fa6a724b0102ccc47d194209802cea02f2e
Author: James Lowe
Date: Sun Mar 5 16:34:39 2017 +0000

   Doc - NR + CG: Clarify Emmentaler is the 'font' and Feta/Parmesan 
are glyphs

   Issue 4966

   Distinguish between Emmentaler
   the 'font' and Feta/Parmesan
   glyphs that make up the
   Emmentaler font family.