[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about internal exported symbols
From: |
Stanislav Ievlev |
Subject: |
Re: about internal exported symbols |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:56:24 +0300 |
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:02:28AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Stanislav Ievlev wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:19:28AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > _nc_sigaction
> > > > _nc_vsscanf
> > > > _nc_wgetch
> > >
> > > ...and some are not exported at all, since they're unused on a given
> > > platform. Here's a list obtained using 'nm':
> > Why not to hide all these unused symbols then?
>
> because they all are used.
>
> The "_nc_" symbols are for things that cannot be done using the documented
> interface, but are needed for one reason or another.
Well, I agree with you.
But I have to ask some questions, because these functions really undocumented.
Why ncurses library (or utils) needs empty _nc_memmove() function on platforms
with legal memove()?
--
With best regards
Stanislav Ievlev.
- about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/02
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/02
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols,
Stanislav Ievlev <=
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/04
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/04
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/05
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/05