[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about internal exported symbols
From: |
Stanislav Ievlev |
Subject: |
Re: about internal exported symbols |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:46:13 +0300 |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:45:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > it doesn't need an empty _nc_memove(). But by placing it in a separate
> > file, it does need - if that module is added to the library - something,
> > since the C standard prohibits empty modules. However, the configure
> > script doesn't add that file to the library unless memmove() is missing.
>
> minor correction - the configure script doesn't omit it from the library
> since that seemed unnecessarily complicated.
Better solution is automake, but you can still made some little
improvements without changing build scheme:
1. _nc_outstr() function looks unused.
2. you can move _nc_sigaction functions, from sigaction.c to lib_tstp.c
and made them static, because this functions used in this file only.
>
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey
> http://invisible-island.net
> ftp://invisible-island.net
- about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/02
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/02
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/03
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Stanislav Ievlev, 2003/12/04
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/04
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/04
- Re: about internal exported symbols,
Stanislav Ievlev <=
- Re: about internal exported symbols, Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/05