[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: error messages with ranges
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: error messages with ranges |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:47:58 -0400 |
How about something like this:
exprs.c:47:15: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int *' and
'_Complex float')
::Argument locations: 47:8-47:14, 47:17-47:24
If the brace notation you've proposed becomes a de facto standard,
we may as well go along with it. But I think this proposal
is better intrinsically, since it is less clutter and no harder to parse.
- error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/11
- error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/11
- Re: error messages with ranges, Karl Berry, 2009/10/11
- Re: error messages with ranges, Karl Berry, 2009/10/12
- Re: error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/13
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/14
- Re: error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/14
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/15
- Re: error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/15
- Re: error messages with ranges,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: error messages with ranges, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Chris Lattner, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Joseph S. Myers, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/18