[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: error messages with ranges
From: |
Manuel López-Ibáñez |
Subject: |
Re: error messages with ranges |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:56:12 +0200 |
2009/10/16 Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
> How about something like this:
>
> exprs.c:47:15: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int *' and
> '_Complex float')
> ::Argument locations: 47:8-47:14, 47:17-47:24
>
> If the brace notation you've proposed becomes a de facto standard,
> we may as well go along with it. But I think this proposal
> is better intrinsically, since it is less clutter and no harder to parse.
Is :: starting a new line? If so, I think emacs does not parse more
than one line of GCC's output at a time. Would that change with this
proposal?
Do numbers may appear in the message between :: and : ?
Cheers,
Manuel.
- Re: error messages with ranges, (continued)
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/15
- Re: error messages with ranges, Manuel López-Ibáñez, 2009/10/15
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Chris Lattner, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Joseph S. Myers, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2009/10/16
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/17
- Re: error messages with ranges,
Manuel López-Ibáñez <=
- Re: error messages with ranges, Richard Stallman, 2009/10/18