[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure
From: |
Doug Goldstein |
Subject: |
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:12:59 -0500 |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 12:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 12/09/2013 00:12, Karl Berry ha scritto:
>>> rms wants --varrundir instead of --rundir for the option name. I expect
>>> there will be objections to that name because of wanting to use /run.
>>
>> Not really because of that, more because the GNU Coding Standards use
>> --localstatedir rather than --vardir.
>>
>>> Other ideas?
>>
>> What about --runstatedir or --runtimestatedir?
>
> I like it. --runstatedir seems reasonable to me; especially along the
> lines of naming the option by WHY it exists rather than WHAT directory
> name is typically used for that option.
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
--runstatedir looks good to me. Since Stefano was hoping someone would
write the automake patch I'll take a swag at it using "runstatedir".
--
Doug Goldstein
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, (continued)
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/09
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/09/10
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/10
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Doug Goldstein, 2013/09/10
- Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/09/11
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Karl Berry, 2013/09/11
Re: /run and needing a --rundir for configure, Eric Blake, 2013/09/12