[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:35:39 GMT |
> As I understand the GNU Coding Standards[1], they refer to sending text
> output to a device
> [1] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/User-Interfaces.html
I see nothing in that section that explicitly says "text" output.
However, I tend to agree that sending tar, compressed, or other such
binary-by-definition files to a terminal is never useful. Does someone
have an argument that it is useful?
gzip has rejected writing to a terminal for ages. As a user, I can say
I have always appreciated that behavior, i.e., I forgot to redirect the
output and I am glad that my terminal/emacs didn't get clobbered by a
bunch of binary junk.
karl
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Eric Blake, 2014/03/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Paul Eggert, 2014/03/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Karl Berry, 2014/03/20
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Karl Berry, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Pavel Raiskup, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Joerg Schilling, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Karl Berry, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] [patch v3] Bug / question in tar, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2014/03/27