[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: notices for CC0
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: notices for CC0 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2017 07:35:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 07:17:02AM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> CC0 is not a "copyright" license, so the text "Copyright (c)" makes
> little sense since the goal is to put the work into the Public Domain
> -- i.e. no copyright applied.
Strictly speaking, the Public Domain consists of works that are old
enough or made by the US or so; CC0 emulates it using copyright
as the means.
> As to what Creative Commons and FSF recommend for non-GNU projects is
> kinda not relevant to what GNU projects are recommended to do by the
> FSF.
So should GNU maintainers add copyright lines to CC0d files? what
about non-gnu Savannah programs? which recommendation applies to them?
what should the hosting requirement be (we routinely point
to GNU Maintainer Info to tell how software should be packaged)?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- notices for CC0, Ineiev, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, John Darrington, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Patrice Dumas, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, John Darrington, 2017/05/30