[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: notices for CC0
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: notices for CC0 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2017 08:12:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 07:45:41AM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > As to what Creative Commons and FSF recommend for non-GNU projects is
> > kinda not relevant to what GNU projects are recommended to do by the
> > FSF.
>
> So should GNU maintainers add copyright lines to CC0d files?
>
> GNU maintainers should ask the FSF/legal@ what license is most prudent
> to use.
What wasn't clear for me is whether they should add copyright lines
to CC0d files written by other people, unrelated to GNU, who followed
FSF's recommendations for non-GNU projects.
> what about non-gnu Savannah programs?
>
> Savannah has guidelines as to what licenses are accepted.
CC0 is GPL-compatible.
> which recommendation applies to them?
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/register/requirements.php
It says that there should be valid license notices, but doesn't mention
copyright notices; are they optional?
> what should the hosting requirement be (we routinely point to GNU
> Maintainer Info to tell how software should be packaged)?
>
> Who is we?
Savannah admins who evaluate new registered projects on Savannah.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- notices for CC0, Ineiev, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, John Darrington, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, Patrice Dumas, 2017/05/30
- Re: notices for CC0, John Darrington, 2017/05/30