[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Oct 2023 09:55:06 +0200 |
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> This looks strnge? Can the conditional be (or should?) on either side
> of the function?
>
> @example
> * frame.h [HAVE_X_WINDOWS] (FRAME_WINDOW_P): Macro defined.
> @end example
>
> Next, an entry for a change within the function @code{init_display},
> whose definition as a whole is unconditional, but the changes
> themselves are contained in a @samp{#ifdef HAVE_LIBNCURSES}
> conditional:
>
> @example
> * dispnew.c (init_display) [HAVE_LIBNCURSES]: If X, call tgetent.
> @end example
This looks perfectly logical to me:
- In the first case, we have a declaration/definition inside #if.
- In the second case, we have a #if inside a definition.
Is the problem that the Emacs ChangeLog mode does not do good syntax
highlighting in one of these two cases? If so, it can be fixed in Emacs.
Bruno
- Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Bruno Haible, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Bruno Haible, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Bruno Haible, 2023/10/15
- Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2023/10/15