[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libsystemd dependencies
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: libsystemd dependencies |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Apr 2024 18:37:23 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> However, the question remains unanswered why it needs 3 different
> compression libraries (liblzma, libzstd, and liblz4). Why would one
> not suffice?
It seems natural to me to have more. If it uses these so as to read
files compressed by users or sysadmins, it makes sense to try to
support whichever compression format those people chose to use.
I'm speculating -- I don't know why it uses these compression liraries.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jose E. Marchesi, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Zack Weinberg, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Russ Allbery, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Zack Weinberg, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Eric Gallager, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02