[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section |
Date: |
Thu, 09 May 2024 16:36:22 -0400 |
If all we cared about was portability to GNU systems we could do away
with 99% of autotools and gnulib; basically everything except
portability between older and newer versions of glibc-based systems.
That would be a good thing in my opinion.
In either case, supporting non-GNU systems is not and has never been a
priority of the GNU project. It is well documented, specifically
under (maintain) Platforms.
- Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Kang-Che Sung, 2024/05/06
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Paul Smith, 2024/05/06
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Kang-Che Sung, 2024/05/06
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Paul Smith, 2024/05/06
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/05/06
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Paul Smith, 2024/05/09
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section, Kang-Che Sung, 2024/05/09
- Re: Unportable makefile example in "Makefile Convention" section,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: what is autotools, what is gnulib, Bruno Haible, 2024/05/09
- Re: what is autotools, what is gnulib, Paul Smith, 2024/05/10