[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ISO opposes variable-length arrays???
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
ISO opposes variable-length arrays??? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:02:27 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> ! Second, because C11 no longer requires support for variable length
> ! arrays,
Can you tell us what's behind this? Is there some practical problem
caused by supporting variable-length arrays? If not, what reason was
there to desupport them?
Our support for variable length arrays is not a matter of following
ISO. GCC has supported variable length arrays since saround 1990. I
didn't wait for ANSI to bless the feature before adding it, and we
have no reason to deprecate the feature because ISO dropped it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards), (continued)
- Re: CVS, Arsen Arsenović, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards), Jason Self, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Paul Eggert, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Paul Eggert, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Richard Stallman, 2024/10/27
ISO opposes variable-length arrays???,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays???, Bruno Haible, 2024/10/15