[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:14:33 -0400 |
This seems to be verging on what prefered VCS should be for web pages
(and incidentally asking everyone to change their workflows), which
isn't a very suitable topic for bug-standards.
CVS nor git is very hard to use for the most basic use cases (in
Emacs, they are essentially the same), git can screw up really badly
and is about as slughish as "cvs commit" as "git push" if you are on a
slow link.
It might be possible for project specific pages web to support git
checkouts, but that should be discussed with webmasters@.
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, (continued)
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Collin Funk, 2024/10/22
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Richard Stallman, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards), Bruno Haible, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS, Bruno Haible, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS, Arsen Arsenović, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/26
- Re: CVS (was: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards), Jason Self, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Paul Eggert, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Paul Eggert, 2024/10/26
- Re: standards.texi update for newer POSIX and C standards, Richard Stallman, 2024/10/27
ISO opposes variable-length arrays???, Richard Stallman, 2024/10/14
Re: ISO opposes variable-length arrays???, Bruno Haible, 2024/10/15