[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:43:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
MH (GNU Mailutils 3.15) |
Hi Piotr,
The --mtime option does not affect atime and ctime. If you want full
binary compatibility, use also the --pax-option option, e.g.:
--pax-option 'atime:=0,ctime:=0'
or
--pax-option 'delete=atime,delete=ctime'
See the end of subsection "Controlling Extended Header Keywords" of the
GNU tar manual for suggestions on how to create binary equivalent archives
in POSIX format. It is available online at:
https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/PAX-keywords.html
Regards,
Sergey
- posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/24
- Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- ODP: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/24
- Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Paul Eggert, 2023/07/24
- ODP: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/25
- Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2023/07/25
- ODP: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/25
- Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2023/07/25
- Re: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Paul Eggert, 2023/07/25
- ODP: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/25
- ODP: posix atime/ctime changes despite mtime being set, Piotr Łobacz, 2023/07/31