[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Mar 2024 23:28:58 +0100 |
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> It's not a might, it's a don't do it. It's a misuse of a command that
> requires an argument, in a place that doesn't pass one.
Thanks for the succint formulation. Can we use it in the warning?
The command after @itemize should not require an argument, but @asis needs an
argument. Try @asis{} instead.
The command after @itemize should not require an argument, but @code needs an
argument. Try @code{} instead.
Bruno
- @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Raymond Toy, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Andreas Schwab, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, pertusus, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, pertusus, 2024/03/07
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/04