[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported
From: |
pertusus |
Subject: |
Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:43:47 +0100 |
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:28:52PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> It could just be the same error message as when used outwith @itemize:
>
> @asis foo
>
> - which gives an error message like:
>
> test.texi:11: @asis expected braces
I also think that it is the best.
> Although it is very unlikely input, I notice with the current code, there
> is also a warning for the following:
>
> @itemize A @bullet
> @item QQbar
> Q foo man
> @end itemize
>
> giving the warning:
>
> test.texi:11: warning: command `@bullet' must not be followed by new line
>
> I don't know how easy it would be to make the error messages consistent or
> if it is worth doing.
with
@itemize A @bullet and more
@end itemize
the same error message is obtained:
b.texi:2: @bullet expected braces
If @asis is followed by a new line and no brace you also get the 'must
not be followed by new line' message (+ expected brace message).
With:
some @asis
g
the error messages are:
b.texi:5: warning: command `@asis' must not be followed by new line
b.texi:6: @asis expected braces
I guess that it is because the @bullet is followed by an @item that
there is not an expected braces messages, with the following:
BB @bullet
N.
there are the two messages:
b.texi:8: warning: command `@bullet' must not be followed by new line
b.texi:9: @bullet expected braces
I think that the "must not be followed by new line" message is for cases
with braces but a new line following the command:
some @asis
{asis argument}.
BB @bullet
{} N.
It may be possible to suppress the "must not be followed by new line" message
if there are no braces, but it would probably be a bit complicated to
implement.
--
Pat
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, (continued)
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Andreas Schwab, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, pertusus, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported,
pertusus <=
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/04
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/05
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Bruno Haible, 2024/03/06
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Patrice Dumas, 2024/03/07
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/12
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Raymond Toy, 2024/03/13
- Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported, Gavin Smith, 2024/03/14