[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?
From: |
Ángel González |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] wcat? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:55:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
On 20/11/14 07:34, Darshit Shah wrote:
And talking about legalities, I'm hoping you already have signed the
assignment papers because otherwise that's even more work, before we
can add this to the source. :-)
Come on, that's not needed for trivial changes :)
The given shell script is a perfect example of trivial patch.
And regarding the "required options", I would keep the
parameter-checking cruft to a minimum.
- [Bug-wget] wcat?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2014/11/17
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Tim Rühsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2014/11/17
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Dagobert Michelsen, 2014/11/19
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, William Tracy, 2014/11/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Pär Karlsson, 2014/11/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Pär Karlsson, 2014/11/19
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Darshit Shah, 2014/11/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Pär Karlsson, 2014/11/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?,
Ángel González <=
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Dagobert Michelsen, 2014/11/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Tim Rühsen, 2014/11/20
- Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2014/11/19
Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?, Tony Lewis, 2014/11/19