Hi Hassen,
I believe I have created a concept for real-time (or scaled real-time) simulation. My federations are both time constrained and time regulating. The point is to make several simulation runs, increase simulation time and then wait for real time. (Simulation run is a small local step done without HLA interaction, e.g. flight dynamics modeling step. This is to reduce HLA overhead.)
I
wonder if there is a better way than what I do?
Petr
Hi all,
I am developping a HLA federation using CERTI. I try to
communicate two simulators: OpenModelica for control part and OpenMASK for graphical part with human interaction(mouse, keyboard...).
- For OpenModelica, i implemented a "TCP wrapper" in which i call the HLA services.
- For OpenMASK, I integrated the HLA services directly in the simulation.
First test, it seems working.. I controlled a graphical federate (OpenMASK) by a comportemental federate (OpenModelica). The both simulators have real time execution. My problem is:
- Which strategy for time i had to use? which federate had to be regulator or constrained? the both simulators are real time, so i can't control the advance of time in each simulator! it means that one can't use Time Management services in a real time simulation?
- Suppose now that the simulators aren't real time. Is it possible to develop a real time HLA simulation USING the Time Management services?
Any idea or suggestion?
Best Regards,
Hassen
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
--
CERTI-Devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/certi-devel