Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator

[Elf]

not all flonums are rational.
chicken is perfectly compliant with r5 here: r5 does not require the entire
numeric tower.

-elf

On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> The manual claims that numerator and denominator are not implemented,
> but of course, they are, just in a way that doesn't quite comply with
> R5RS.  (R5RS says that any rational is a valid argument, but Chicken
> only accepts integers.)
>
> Two possible solutions: Change the manual to document reality; implement
> numerator/denominator for flonums.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-hackers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers