Re: [Chicken-hackers] r5rs compliant (part ii)

[John Cowan]

Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:

> Of these, I don't care about the first, and care only marginally about
> the fourth.  I would be happy to supply implementations for 2 and 3.

Certainly nobody's going to take your patches, fling them down, and
spit on them.  I for one would welcome our new R5RS-compliant overcodes.

> Given that, I think the manual section should be renamed something other
> than "deviations from the standard" and re-labelled "standard
> conformance" or some-such, and I would be happy to supply text for a
> reorganized page.

The reason it's a wiki is so that anyone can change it, hopefully in
the direction of making the documentation fit reality.  Be bold.

-- 
John Cowan    address@hidden    http://ccil.org/~cowan
If a traveler were informed that such a man [as Lord John Russell] was
leader of the House of Commons, he may well begin to comprehend how the
Egyptians worshiped an insect.  --Benjamin Disraeli